|
Seeing Green: Study Finds Greening is a Good Investment
Strategy for a Green City, Summer 2005
Advocates
of urban greening often promote the intangible benefits that open
space provides, such as improving the quality of city life and fostering
a sense of community pride. While these benefits are difficult to
quantify, a ground-breaking study from the Wharton
School of the University of Pennsylvania now offers solid evidence
that investment in greening yields significant economic returns,
specifically, dramatic increases in real estate values.
Funded by the William Penn Foundation, The Determinants
of Neighborhood Transformation in Philadelphia: Identification and
Analysis—The New Kensington Pilot Study, was developed and produced
by Susan Wachter, professor of real estate, finance, and city and
regional planning at the Wharton School. It looked at the economic
impact of "place-based investment strategies," particularly
the Pennsylvania Horticultural Society's seven-year greening effort
in the New Kensington area of North Philadelphia.
"We were always convinced that greening has
a tremendously positive impact on communities," says J. Blaine
Bonham, Jr., executive vice president of PHS. "The success
of our Philadelphia Green program has demonstrated this. Now, the
Wharton findings begin to quantify the positive return on the investment
in greening."
From 1995 through 2002, the Pennsylvania Horticultural
Society's Philadelphia Green program worked in partnership with
the New Kensington Community Development Corporation (NKCDC) to
address the blight caused by more than 1,100 parcels of abandoned
land in the neighborhood and to come up with a vacant-land management
plan for the community. The goal was to improve the area's appearance
and help stem population loss, attract new residents, and encourage
reinvestment.
The partners created a comprehensive greening program, funded largely
by the city's Office of Housing and Community Development, with
support from The Pew Charitable Trusts and the William Penn Foundation.
The strategy included "stabilizing" vacant lots (clearing
debris and installing fencing and trees), creating community gardens,
planting trees, renovating parks, and transferring vacant lots to
adjacent homeowners for private use. The results of the PHS-NKCDC
partnership include 480 newly planted trees, 145 settled side yards,
217 stabilized lots, and 15 community gardens.
Wachter's team utilized new technology and economic
models to measure the impact of greening as accurately as possible,
adjusting for other factors that affect real estate values, such
as varying characteristics of individual homes and proximity to
public transportation and schools. Sales information and other real
estate data came from Philadelphia's Board of Revision of Taxes,
while NKCDC and PHS provided information on greening projects in
the area.
The study incorporates sales records on thousands
of homes and more than 50 variables. To analyze the relationship
between greening investments and house values, the Wharton School's
Geographic Information Systems laboratory created a special database
that included the location and timing of greening projects.
The study found significant increases in the value
of individual homes near cleaned lots, streets trees, and parks
(see sidebar). It also found a considerable increase in the total
value of property in the community. According to Wachter, tree plantings
alone account for a total increase of about $4 million, while lot
improvements increased the total value by $12 million.
Key Findings of the Wharton School Study
- Cleaning and greening of vacant lots can increase adjacent property values by as much as 30%.
- Planting a tree within 50 feet of a house can increase its value by about 9%.
- Location of a house within 1/4 mile from a park increased values by 10%.
- Neighborhood blocks with higher concentrations of unmanaged vacant lots displayed lower house prices, about 18%.
|
Previous studies of urban greening investments
have shown a positive relationship but have been smaller in scale,
focusing on a limited number of properties and on the impact of
a few parks or large-scale open spaces, such as greenways. For example,
a Boulder, Colorado study found that the average value of properties
adjacent to a greenbelt there was 32% higher than that of those
located 3,200 feet away.
At the completion of the greening project in New
Kensington, anecdotal evidence pointed to an immediate increase
in property values in the neighborhood. Sandy Salzman, executive
director of the New Kensington Community Development Corporation,
says that, prior to the greening effort, the organization had a
difficult time selling homes it renovated, but vacant lots in the
neighborhood are now selling for thousands of dollars. "We
couldn't give the land away when we started this program,"
she recalls.
"Clearly, the greening of New Kensington
has borne fruit in economic terms," says Susan Wachter, who
notes that the community-wide scope of the greening effort in New
Kensington made it a natural focus for this research. "People
are not only more willing to choose this neighborhood and pay more
for living in this neighborhood, but it also spurs other reinvestment."
Steven T. Wray, deputy director of the Pennsylvania
Economy League, who served on the committee that initiated the study,
agrees: "The Wharton research shows that a coordinated, effective
strategy for greening a neighborhood can have a real impact, not
just on the appearance of the neighborhood, but on the value of
housing and commercial property. That increase is multiplied as
individuals and businesses further invest in the community."
Wachter suggests that the "direct and indirect
impacts to the city's property tax base are likely to contribute
to the overall fiscal health of the city." Going forward, she
imagines a possible spill-over effect: with a healthier tax base,
the city could offer improved services, encouraging more people
to come back, thereby lowering individual tax burdens over the long-term.
The Wharton study shows that the positive effects
of greening go well beyond intangible, "feel-good" benefits
and that greening is an important tool for economic revitalization.
Its findings will be part of continuing policy discussions on neighborhood
investments in Philadelphia, as well as in other cities throughout
the United States.
A more comprehensive Wharton School study looks
at the entire city, measuring the impact of Mayor John Street's
Neighborhood Transformation Initiative, a multimillion-dollar anti-blight
campaign, on housing prices, public safety, and other quality-of-life
issues. The results of that study are forthcoming.
|